Ελαφονησιώτες Αφυπνιστήτε

Ελαφονησιώτες Αφυπνιστήτε

Ο Δήμαρχος και ο Αντιδήμαρχος του νησιού μας την ώρα αυτή που αναβιώνει ο Εφιάλτης κατασκευής του εργοστασίου Ηλεκτρικής Ενέργειας αντί να κινητοποιήσουν τους κατοίκους και τους φορείς του τόπου μας για να δοθεί ενα νέο μύνημα στην κεντρική εξουσία μοιράζονται θέσεις και ξεπουλούν το αιγιαλό και την παραλία του νησιού μας σε οικοπεδοφάγους και σε ημετέρους.

Ο δε Δήμαρχος με παρεμβασή του στον αναπληρωτή Υπουργό Περιβάλλοντος του ζητάει να συνεχιστεί το παραβατικό και παράνομο καθεστώς που έχει δημιουργηθεί με απάτη στον αιγιαλό και την Παραλία του νησιού μας για να «επωφεληθούν κι αυτοί που δεν προλάβανε...»!

Όπως έχω χειριστεί προσωπικά με παρέμβαση μου στον τότε Υπουργό Εσωτερικών κο Ραγκούση Γιάννη την ύδριση του Καλλικρατικού Δήμου του νησιού μας έτσι έχω χειριστεί προσωπικά το θέμα της μετατόπισης της γραμμής αιγιαλού και παραλίας και της γραμμής δόμησης οι οποίες μετατοπίστηκαν προς τη θάλασσα για να μπορούν κάποιοι να ξεπουλούν ανύπαρκτα οικόπεδα.

Συγκεκριμένα παραθέτω ό,τι μετά από πρωτοβουλία μου, στο από 20/03/2008 αίτημα της Κοινότητας Ελαφονήσου, λοιπών φορέων του νησιού(οπως ο Πολιτιστικός και Αθλητικός Σύλλογος) και 18 ακόμα ατόμων προς το ΥΠ. ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΩΝ / Κ.Υ.Ν. ΛΑΚΩΝΙΑΣ, ζητήσαμε τον επανακαθορισμό οριογραμμών αιγιαλού και παραλίας για να αποτρέψουμε την λεηλάτηση των παραλιών του νησιού μας απο άτομα που αδιαφορούν για τις συνέπειες που θα προκληθούν. Από το ΥΠ. ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΩΝ / Κ.Υ.Ν. ΛΑΚΩΝΙΑΣ συστάθηκε 5μελής Επιτροπή η οποία μετά απο εξονυχιστικό έλεγχο εγγράφων-αυτοψίας- φωτογραφίων και θεωρώντας ότι οι φωτογραφίες καταμαρτυρούν τα όσα προαναφέρονται ακόμα και σε ένορκες καταθέσεις, προτείνει και γνωμοδοτεί προς το Γ.Ε.Ν. με την έκθεση της στης 27/05/08, οτι πρέπει να γίνει επανακαθορισμός των κορυφών του αιγιαλού-παραλίας στην αρχική τους θέση.

Επίσης για την υφισταμένη γραμμή δόμησης που επεκτάθηκε με απόφαση της Γενικής Γραμματείας Περιφέρειας Πελοππονήσου 1161/7-4-2004 (ΦΕΚ 417/Δ/24- 04-2004), μετά από αίτηση μας για διευκρίνηση του καθεστώτος, ο Προιστάμενος της Διεύθυνσης ΠΕ.ΧΩ. ΠΕΡΙΦΕΡΕΙΑΣ ΠΕΛΟΠΟΝΝΗΣΟΥ κ. Κολλάς Σταύρος με έγγραφο του στις 17/06/2010, αρ. πρωτοκόλλου 386 προς το Υ.ΠΕ.ΚΑ / Διευθύνση Πολεοδομικού Σχεδιασμού-Τμήμα Β, γνωστοποιεί οπως αναφέρει οτι η σχετική απόφαση έχει εκδοθεί κατά νόσφιση εξουσίας, καθώς απο τις διατάξεις του Ν.3044/2002 προβλέπεται ότι οι πολεοδομικές ρυθμίσεις στους παραλιακούς οικισμούς εμπίπτουν στις αρμοδιότητες του Υπουργού ΠΕ.ΧΩ.ΔΕ (Υ.ΠΕ.ΚΑ) και όχι στον Γενικό Γραμματέα Περιφέρειας.

Κατόπιν τούτου η Διεύθυνση Πολεοδομικού Σχεδιασμού-Τμήμα Β και με το Διευθυντή κ. Λουλουργά στις 30/07/2010 και αρ. πρωτοκόλλου 29313 έγγραφο της ζητάει απο την Διεύθυνση Νομοθετικού ΈΈργου / Υ.ΠΕ.ΚΑ, κοινοποιώντας το στον Υπουργό και σε όλα τα αρμόδια γραφεία, την αναστολή έκδοσης οικοδομικών αδειών σε όλο το μήκος του παραλιακού μετώπου του οικισμού της Κοινότητας Ελαφονήσου οπως περιγράφεται στη 1161/07-04-2004 αποφάση Γ.Γ. ΠΕΡΙΦΕΡΕΙΑΣ ΠΕΛΟΠΟΝΝΗΣΟΥ (ΦΕΚ 417/Δ/24- 04-2004).

Πάντως να σημειώσω ότι το κοινό όφελος της Ελαφονήσου είναι βεβαίως και δικό μου προσωπικό όφελος όπως απέδειξα και με την παρέμβαση μου για την ίδρυση του Δήμου μας με τα κάτωθι επιχειρήματα προς τον τότε Υπουργό Εσωτερικών κο Ραγκούση Ιωάννη:

1ον Η Τεκμηρίωση του οτι πραγματικά είμαστε κι εμείς ένα νησί όσο και αν η κοντινή μας απόσταση με την στεριά αυτό το αναιρούσε και το οποίο είχε συμβάλλει για την μη κατοχύρωση Καλλικρατικού Δήμου για το νησί μας. Αυτό βέβαια το ακύρωσα προσκομίζοντας βεβαίωση που είχα προβλέψει και είχα ζητήσει με αίτηση μου από το Λιμεναρχείο Νεαπόλεως Βοιών για τα απαγορευτικά δρομολόγια της χειμερινής περιόδου που ταλαιπωρούν τους κατοίκους και του μικρούς μαθητες του νησιού μας και την οποία κατέθεσα στον κο Υπουργό.

2ον Το άλλο επιχείρημα εξ ίσου σοβαρό με το 1ο ήταν ότι με την δημιουργία Καλλικρατικού Δήμου στο νησί μας θα μας δοθεί η δυνατότητα να διεκδικήσουμε κάποιες υπηρεσίες οι οποίες εκτός των οικονομικών οφελιών που θα έχουμε κατά τη μακρά χειμερινή περίοδο που βιώνουμε σαν κάτοικοι ενός μικρού νησιού θα μας παρείχαν και καλύτερη ασφάλεια-αστυνόμευση και θα τηρούσαν την έννομη τάξη(αστυνομία-λιμενικό).

Δυστυχώς όμως οι ενέργειες αυτών των δυο ανθρώπων που ηγούνται στον δήμο μας οδηγούν σε εντελώς διαφορετικά συμπεράσματα. Γιατί εκτός απο το βέβαιο πως είναι ακατάλληλοι πολύ φοβάμαι ότι είναι κι επικίνδυνοι. Τόσο για την λεηλάτηση των παραλιών και την καταστροφή του φυσικού πλούτου του νησιού μας όσο και για την υποθήκευση ενός μεγάλου επιτεύγματος που είναι ο Καλλικρατικός μας Δήμος.

Με εκτίμηση,

Χαράλαμπος Γεωργίου Κοντάκος

The Problem of Physics

Here i shall posit some fundamental physical axioms in order to help explain where the problem of the unified theory lies, in layman terms, and bring physics down to their original realm of simplicity and beauty, instead of the boring technical jargon and dogmatism of modern physics.

As men we define some constants, like the 1 metre in order to be able to measure our immediate reality. Our metrical measurements need to be perfect, in order to be accurate. In order to do that we define the line, the perfect line that is 180 degrees. Without the perfect line and the 5th Euklidean axiom, there can be no algebra, which is based on the equally infinite distance between 2 consecutive numbers(which pretty much obviously can only take place between 2 perfectly parallel lines).

Physicists ever since the antiquity with the exception of Aristotle and some others which i neglect, have been keeping the geometry constant, and have been explaining the discrepancy(acceleration, deccelaration) of an object to the presence of other forces which cause such discrepancies such as non-constant velocity. Aristotle as well as Einstein, changed the tune, and instead of keeping the geometry constant, kept the Force/Energy constant, and consequently the velocity in F=mv, and E=mc^2, the problem with that is so obvious in the immediate reality that Newton's classical mechanics in constant(euklidean) geometry are too accurate, and too simple to be overlooked in favor of an Einsteinian or Aristotelian reality, this is perfectly illustrated with Aristotle's problem to explain the deccelaration of arrows, as you imagine the non-constant velocity of physical objects at a constant energy/force can then only be explained due to a discrepancy at the geometric fabric, necessarily then theorizing up the hill geometry(deccelarating) or down the hill(accelerating) geometry and dumping the non-constant velocity in that domain instead of a change in energy/force.

There are some fundamental axioms that everybody needs to be aware of:

a) It is as humans that have to pick to keep something constant, either the geometry or the energy/force, if we want to measure anything. b) Keeping one thing constant necessarily the other thing becomes imperfect, not because it actually is, but because our perception perceives accelerations and deccelerations, and these need to be explained somehow. c) Our goal as a humanity is to experiment with both constants, and eventually unite the respective theories of physical reality where both variables are constant and then what we term as the ideal world shall become the world. d) Keep in mind that all theories regarding the universe are derivatives of either 1 or 2 constant-keeping, and as such are both assumptions. Keep also in mind that theories coming from the non-constant geometry are to be taken with a huge grain of salt because at their base axiom they are experimentally void(because a fourth dimension, which is fundamental to the theorization of any fabric curvature, cannot in any sense become experimentally verified), while some of the additional postulates of either theory can become experimentally verified, especially those that deal with actual physical objects but these are not necessarily absolutely relevant to the base axiom and as such do not necessarily require the base-axiom which does not apply to our human physical reality.

For atehists

Me Young i bother....

Track 1
Track 2
Track 3
Track 4
Track 5

......

To be continued

Averment Pro Se

Most of you wonder what this means...This is a Notary-certified declaration(Averment Pro Se) stated by a History student named Vasiliye Gligorov national of F.Y.R.o.M.

Part of the text translated in English by Vasiliye:

XIX) By stating the facts in previous chapter, to the uttermost of my knowledge, the truth, nothing more, nothing less, without guilty mind or in dissimulation.

1. I, Vasil Gligorov, as an act of free will, individual one and unadulterated, acting in competency of a history student on University, which is not otherwise affiliated with me or my statement in entirety, do affirm these truths, remaining ready to prove them in case of any challenge, being assured in them as a result of a critical, open-minded study of the matters exposed, that:

2. Macedonians were and are Hellenes, from their genesis in antiquity to the present day. ”Macedonian” in this single, undivided and non-shared sense is a Hellenic individual directly affiliated with the region of Macedonia in its historic borders, which are more restrictive from the fairly new concept of “Geographic Macedonia”, the later being enormously stretched to the north of the true Macedonia. The evidence derived from history, linguistics, interpretation of archaeological artifacts and other relevant sciences point to this conclusion.

3. The ancient Slavs of and the Slavic peoples derived from them, also known as “Slavs”, and Hellenes, both groups being Indo-European peoples with few loose traces of common I. E. cultural heritage are nevertheless two very separate peoples, with their own characteristics, including separate languages, culture and history including their formation as an ethnicity in different and distant areas, as well as in possession of distinct ethnological attributes, withstanding the certain degree of historical mutual influence on each other which did not altered them.

4. The South-Slavs of Eastern type, known en masse from 1944 to the World as “Macedonians” and which compromise the main people of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, are an artificial, primarily Communist creation initiated by the Comintern and by the dictator Josip Broz and his subservient apparatschiks. The existence of these Pseudomacedonians was first brought by their “recognition”, in spite of historical and ethnologic realities, by the acts of the
53
illegitimate AVNOJ organization. Many people, primarily conscious Bulgarians and also Serbs and others, suffered by the post-WW II regime in Yugoslavia because of their rejection of the forced “Macedonisation”.

The wrongful Yugoslav intrusion into the 1946-1949 Civil War in Greece is a crime, the motive of which was in accordance with the Pseudomacedonian ideology of expropriation of the real Macedonia.

5. The usurpation of Hellenic heritage and expansionist agenda by the many Pseudomacedonians, including segments of their state, where the fake doctrine of “Macedonism” is an official creed, is not only one of the main generator of crisis in the Balkans, but it is an self-injury of the Slavic Pseudomacedonians to their true, traditional heritages: Bulgarian and Serbian.

I, Vasil Gligorov, thereby, affirm that the victory of truth and reason over the forces of Bolshevik Pseudomacedonism will benefit Slavs of FYROM, Slavs in general, Greeks and all other parties involved in these unfortunate circumstances.




Изјавено во Скопје,
Изјављено у Скопљу,
Stated in Skopje,
21-XI-2007

Васил Глигоров

Contact Vasil @ vasil.gligorov@gmail.com

Retrieved by macedoniaontheweb.com

UNION IN POLEON

UNI ON EN POLY ON

Unity in Diversity.

Philosophy without technique is Useless.

Technique without philosophy is Dangerous.

SOCRATES-ISON-PATANJALI

-noemon-

EN=IN
ON=BEING
ENON=ONE->ENOS
ENONEN=UNION->ENOSIS
POLY=PLENTITUDE
POLY ON=PLENTY BEING=POLIS=CITY.

ENON POLYON ENON EMON

ENON ELENON EMON

PRONUNCIATION-ΙΝΤΟΝΕΑΤΙΟΝ
EV EN IXI EN EL
.................................
.
.
.
Ε
ΕΛ ΕΝ
ΕΝ ΕΛ ΕΔ
ΕΔ ΕΜ ΕΓ ΕΝ
ΕΜ ΕΝ ΕΛ ΕΔ ΕΓ
ΕΒ ΕΓ Ε Ν Ω Ν ΕΔ ΕΛ
ΕΝ ΟΜ ΕΡ ΟΝ ΕΝ ΝΕ ΑΝ
3Λ 3Δ 3Ν ω Ν 3Z 3Β
3Γ 3Ν 3Λ 3Δ 3Μ
3Ν 3Μ 3Γ 3Δ
3Β 3Λ 3Ν
3Ν 3Γ
3
.
.
.
.................................

ΕΝ
ΟΝ
----
ΕΛ
ΕΝ
ΟΝ
----
ΕΜ
ΟΝ

Pindar Odes

Olympian 2 For Theron of Acragas Chariot Race 476 B. C.

[1] Songs, rulers of the lyre, what god, what hero, what man shall we celebrate? Indeed, Pisa belongs to Zeus; and Heracles established the Olympic festival, as the finest trophy of battle; [5] and Theron must be proclaimed because of his victorious four-horse chariot, Theron who is just in his regard for guests, and is the bulwark of Acragas, the strength of the city, the choicest bloom of illustrious ancestors, [8] who labored much with their spirits, and won a sacred home by the river, and were [10] the eye of Sicily; their allotted lifetime attended them, bringing wealth and grace to their inborn excellence. But you, son of Cronus and Rhea, who rule over your home on Olympus, and over the foremost of festivals, and over the ford of Alpheus, be warmed by our songs and graciously preserve their ancestral land [15][15] for their future generations. When deeds have been accomplished, whether justly or contrary to justice, not even Time the father of all things could undo the outcome. But forgetfulness may come, with favorable fortune. Under the power of noble joys, malignant pain [20] is subdued and dies, [21] whenever god-sent Fate lifts prosperity on high. This saying applies to the daughters of Cadmus on their lovely thrones: they suffered greatly, but their heavy sorrow collapsed in the presence of greater blessings. [25] Long-haired Semele, who died in the roar of the thunderbolt, lives among the Olympians; Pallas is her constant friend, and indeed so is father Zeus, and she is loved by her ivy-crowned son. [28] And they say that even in the sea, among the ocean-daughters of Nereus, immortal life [30] is granted to Ino for all time. Truly, for mortal men at least, the time when we will reach the limit of death is by no means fixed, nor when we will bring a peaceful day, the sun's child, to an end in unworried well-being. But at various times various currents, both of pleasure and of toil, come to men. [35][35] In such a way does Fate, who keeps their pleasant fortune to be handed from father to son, bring at another time some painful reversal together with god-sent prosperity, since the destined son met and killed Laius, and fulfilled the oracle of Pytho, [40] spoken long before. [41] But the sharp-eyed Erinys saw it, and destroyed his warlike sons through mutual slaughter. Yet Polyneices, when laid low, left behind him a son, Thersander, honored in youthful contests and in the battles of war, [45] a scion to defend the house of the descendants of Adrastus. And it is fitting that the son of Aenesidamus, whose roots grew from that seed, should meet with songs of praise and with the lyre. [48] For in Olympia he himself received a prize of honor; at Pytho [50] and at the Isthmus, the Graces who love them both brought garlands of flowers to his equally blessed brother for his four-horse team, victorious in the twelve courses of the race. To attempt a contest and be successful brings release from sadness. Wealth adorned with excellence brings many opportunities, rousing deep wild ambitions; [55][55] it is a brilliant star, a man's true light, at least if one has and knows the future, that the reckless souls of those who have died on earth immediately pay the penalty--and for the crimes committed in this realm of Zeus there is a judge below the earth; with hateful [60] compulsion he passes his sentence. [61] But having the sun always in equal nights and equal days, the good receive a life free from toil, not scraping with the strength of their arms the earth, nor the water of the sea, [65] for the sake of a poor sustenance. But in the presence of the honored gods, those who gladly kept their oaths enjoy a life without tears, while the others undergo a toil that is unbearable to look at. [68] Those who have persevered three times, on either side, to keep their souls free from all wrongdoing, [70] follow Zeus' road to the end, to the tower of Cronus, where ocean breezes blow around the island of the blessed, and flowers of gold are blazing, some from splendid trees on land, while water nurtures others. With these wreaths and garlands of flowers they entwine their hands [75][75] according to the righteous counsels of Rhadamanthys, whom the great father, the husband of Rhea whose throne is above all others, keeps close beside him as his partner. Peleus and Cadmus are counted among them, and Achilles who was brought there by his mother, when she had [80] persuaded the heart of Zeus with her prayers-- [81] Achilles, who laid low Hector, the irresistible, unswerving pillar of Troy, and who consigned to death Memnon the Ethiopian, son of the Dawn. I have many swift arrows in the quiver under my arm, [85] arrows that speak to the initiated. But the masses need interpreters.¹ The man who knows a great deal by nature is truly skillful, while those who have only learned chatter with raucous and indiscriminate tongues in vain like crows [88] against the divine bird of Zeus. Now, bend your bow toward the mark; tell me, my mind, whom are we trying to hit [90] as we shoot arrows of fame from a gentle mind? I will aim at Acragas, and speak with true intent a word sworn by oath: no city for a hundred years has given birth to a man more beneficent in his mind or more generous with his hand [95][95] than Theron. But praise is confronted by greed, which is not accompanied by justice, but stirred up by depraved men, eager to babble and to bury the fine deeds of noble men. Since the sand of the shore is beyond all counting, [100] who could number all the joys that Theron has given others?

Many thanks to Orphic Hymn from MacedoniaOntheWeb.
Source: Perseus Tufts

The Universe is Flat

A high-flying balloon that soared over Antarctica has answered one of cosmology's greatest questions by revealing that the fabric of the Universe is "flat". To astronomers, flat means that the usual rules of geometry are observed - light not being bent by gravity travels in straight lines, not curves. But since Albert Einstein proposed that the Universe may be "curved", the debate has been open. It will mean rewriting the text books on the history of the Universe Professor Peter Ade Scientific opinion has moved towards a flat Universe and the latest data confirm this with greater certainty than ever before. Another result of the study is the prediction that the Universe will continue its steady expansion, which started at the Big Bang, and will not collapse into a "Big Crunch". "It's a tremendously exciting result - and one that will mean rewriting the text books on the history of the Universe," said one of the research team, Professor Peter Ade at Queen Mary College, University of London. Faint heat The new information is an exquisitely accurate map of the very faint afterglow of heat left behind by the Big Bang. This is called the Cosmic Microwave Background and is equivalent to the tiny warmth given off by something just a few degrees above absolute zero, -273 degC. The detectors were cooled to -273 deg Celsius Tiny temperature variations in the CMB, just 0.1% at most, allow scientists to test different models of how the Universe began and expanded. The map paints a picture of the young Universe, just 300,000 years old - the cosmos is now over 12 billion years old. The chart was made by an international team led by Paulo de Bernardis of the University of Rome La Sapienza. He said: "It's really exciting to be able to see some of the fundamental structures of the Universe in their embryonic state. The achievement, he said, was distinguishing the CMB from other interference: "The light we have detected has travelled across the entire Universe and we are perfectly able to distinguish it from the light generated in our own galaxy." Sky high boomerang The project to map the CMB was called Boomerang (Balloon Observations of Millimetric Extragalactic Radiation and Geophysics). On release, Bomerang soared skywards The measurements were made using a very sensitive telescope suspended from a balloon 40,000 metres (131,000 feet) above Antarctica. The instrument flew around the frozen continent between 29 December 1998 and 8 January 1999. It has taken since then to process the one billion measurements. The calculations alone would have taken six years to complete if run on a desktop computer. On the Cray T3E supercomputer at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, US, they took less than three weeks. The fundamental cosmic parameters derived from the work are accurate to within just a few percent. The research is published in the journal Nature and in an accompanying commentary, Wayne Hu, of the US School of Natural Sciences, New Jersey, said: "The Boomerang result supports a flat Universe. A perfectly flat Universe will keep on expanding forever, because there is not enough matter to make it recollapse in a 'Big Crunch'." The research backs the inflation theory of the Universe put forward in 1980, which suggests that the whole of the cosmos expanded from a single tiny point at the Big Bang. At that time, and for a short while after, space was curved because it was confined in a small region. However, the Universe's expansion has been so great that space has now been stretched to the point that it is essentially flat.

Source: BBC News

Why TheOn and not A-The-On

Why Atheism is invalid?
As i have been requested by Doomhammer and various other people even though i have explained it various times, my language has not been appropriate evidently therefore ill try to be as simple as it can get.

So, why atheism is invalid?

Observe an animal from the animal kingdom, any animal.

The animal dwells into a specific environment, within some boundaries, the animal looks as far as it can see and defines its living space within that boundaries. The animal fails into looking spherically not just ahead and back but also up and down, that way the animal fails to perform certain functions, like define its living space in regards to the Stars, it defines its living space in regards with what it can be seen immediately.

The Human as another animal on the other hand defines his living space not just in the earth but also above, the human looks onto the stars and tries to figure out his positioning not just on earth in relation to a mountain or a lake or the coasts of a sea, but also in relation with other extra-terra objects such as the Sun, the Moon, the Planets, other galaxies.

So, the human needs to define a point of reference in order to be able to perform logical statements and deduce from there or add from the bottom to the top and ascend to logic(Logos).

An example, what was Aristotle's argument in favor of that the earth is a sphere?

He said, since the shadow that the earth creates on the moon during the eclipse is spherical, thus the earth is a sphere.

Something very simple really.

The key for this observation and for these observations in general is to be able to look above instead of contaminating yourself on the horizon.

When you look above the sky is unlimited, and the first thing you think is where do i begin from? So, you choose a point of reference in regards to the stars and as soon as you got your point of reference you start classifying the rest of the sky.

This point of reference is what the Ellines, Hindus, Chinese, Celts and many others termed as Om or On or actually more accurately OMN and thus "omnipotent" The Being, the being acts as a point of reference in order for you to be able to deduce and try to understand what is in between you and the On, some believe that since you cannot see the On, and understand it this is useless, these are who we(The Ellines=Shining / Bright Ones) called as Skotadiste(Dark forces) for the On or simply God is not there for someone to understand God itself, it is simply there as a dot as a point of reference in order for you dear Human to understand what is in between of the 2 dots(YouOn = you the being) and the (TheON = The being an imaginary "friend" somewhere up there, anywhere, it depends on you where you want to put it, on the taurus constallation, on the pisces, just pick a star(t), any star that shall act as your start, as your point of reference.

So, let us take the term a-theism, atheism is he who does not accept the-On and hence a-the-on= non the being without the being.

Basically he who declares atheon(-s) is he who does not create a closed system between himself and a supreme being which can be used as a point of reference in order to understand what is inside this closed system of you as a human and an indefinite being somewhere up there. As soon as you define the being anywhere on the sky, as soon as you find your ideal point of reference, then you draw an axiom(cross) 2 equal lines that divide this area of observation into four sectors the tetartimoria, this is what gave birth to the four sides North, South, East and West, Using a point of reference in combination with the axiom one is able to read what is inside the 4 sectors and define them logically. The Priesthood, any kind of priest hood would kill for these information, not to be made public in order for them to be the ones that who are able to do that and drive their cattle around as they wish. So, instead of them giving you information about how to perform these actions, they basically give you information about what they termed as God, the point of reference, which is something imaginary and it acts solely as a point of reference and hence why it shall never be comprehended, because it is nothing, it is simply the mean point of an object, it is simply the pint 0 of the X and Y axis(the axiom), it simply is there to offer you with an Arche(A Starting point) which can be used as metrically with 1 metre or an ounce or whatever, the size of the metron does not matter, what matters is the metre in its geometric distribution to be equal and as accurate as possible.

Without the-ON(God), the point of reference one is unable to create this metre himself and one basically just reproduces information as served on the plate, one basically becomes a guided robot, one basically is unable to see further than where the shadow of his nose lies.

I hope you understand why a-the-on is not just invalid but dangerous for mankind and it is the ground zero for the ugly globalization that wishes to put the Humans inside a little box, to create Humans that are unable to think themselves and serve them with beautiful arguments whatever fits their cause.

Now, that i hope that some of you might understand the importance of the The On or Deus or Dio, or whatever you choose to call it, the ground zero, after all it is no coincidence that the point O is a circle and the Being On is composed by a circle and that the starting point of an X. and Y axis is O, you might also be able to understand what is the importance of the material Little Von posted, the Planetary Creatix Medidation, this is just one part of the various sects that have popped out of the blue the past century who aim to teach Humans how to meditate correctly.

Some of them are frauds while some of them are for real. This is something that every single one of us has to choose correctly, the guide. But let us not enter there, yet.
First, let us explain why meditation is very very important.

Meditation most importantly but not just that, lies on the premise that all are interrelated, humans, animals, plants, stars, galaxies, that all(Holon) are one stream, like a river, and that all move together combined and together the "panta rhei" of one of the Greatest Ellinic philosophers(Heraclitus). Now since all move along together on the energy field we as humans must do our bit to help the Harmony of the linear thread, we should do that not just for the thread which we are a part of, but we should do it in order to find ourselves(the main goal of Yoga=Union, body and mind). How do we do that? We meditate and through meditation, we not only try to listen to the sound produced by nature, but we try to concentrate all our energy to express the same sound as the nature so we locate the equilibrium point and achieve harmony.

As you all atheo-scientologists know by now, the Human produces energy which is transmitted to the environment as thermal, the thermal energy we produce is bound to the second law of thermodynamics, entropy, it gets magnified the further it goes out of the atmosphere and it reaches to become some huge amounts of energy when it leaves the earth, this energy gets out of our bodies, from the ears, the eyes, the anus, the cock(which the life-producing organ) and of course the mouth as sound and not to forget the skin as a whole as sweat.

In order for us to find out how to control this energy, thus we close our eyes and ears in order to concentrate the energy inside our bodies(brains), with the concentration this energy gathers and gathers and it reaches a point whereas we can feel it, because as it gets out of the eyes and ears we do not really feel it that much cause there is continuous flow and we do not even realize, but when we concentrate it and imprison it inside us, and suddenly let it go,we can actually feel it as it flows outside our bodies. That way we can control it, and specify its target, with a lot of practice, this way we can learn how to communicate with each other, without words, because the words also are energy, energy that sources from our diaphragm, and the sounds is manipulating this energy to create specific sounds that are used for communication. The same way we manipulate our breath from the diaphragm to come out as expressed language, the same way we can learn how to communicate using the energy that lies inside our brains and communicate with each other, or with other beings that are also embedded on the energy of the Holon, the ALL.

Basically, i shall stop for now, so that it gets digested without much effort, and if you want me to explain to you why the prayers of the main religions use breaths and language ill tell you another time, and why there is no such mental concentration voiceless as it should be as is the case of Yoga for example or Buddhism which after the basic training of learning how to express the Omn, you stop using your breath and you focus onto the mental projection, and not the voice expression.

Regards, Georgion Kontakon.

The thread, the linear, the cyclical, the Arche and the apeiron Telos!

Someone posted this article titled: Teaching Plato in Palestine, i was amazed by that for the simple reason that Muslims are not compatible with the Platonic definition of the divine.

Plato differentiates between substance and form, between ousia and hyle. That way Plato defines the Line and the Arche of the Line. In simple terms he says: We all belong to a line of the same substance=Homoousion. God is the Arche, and the line is an extension of the Arche which reaches to the apeiron(infinity) that way God is everywhere and inside us, and all around us. God is not incorporeal as Maimonides has it, is not independent from the thread or the Line. This explains the butterfly effect and reasons the divine punishment. We are all from the same substance, all belonging to the Line, and we produce energy through the motion of electrons in our brains, when we produce negative energy, this energy is transmitted towards all directions, towards the Arche and the Telos, but the Telos is apeiron, and the energy gets lost in the apeiron it never comes back, while when it reaches the Arche(God, Theos, Chaos), it bounces and it comes back to us manifested in natural phenomena, through the very same energy that we produced. That, the Arche acts as God, the Arche "judges"{Filters} the energy and bounces it back in the form of energy, as "punishment" or as "appraisal" depending on the energy and the various mediums(photons), this energy manifests itself in the natural phenomena.

The Christians are compatible with this notion and hence the kat éikona (same to the image) but also the kath ómoiosis (same to the substance). However the O.T. does not agree with this notion it only recognizes the same image, not the same substance, that way the Jews define a line with neither Arche, nor Telos, they fail to distinguish the position of God on the Line, they say that God is everywhere and nowhere, they reject the notion that He is the Start, the homoiosis of Jesus Christ, who came to fulfill their scripts. I had the idea that the Muslims accept the same notion as the Jews, i had the idea that they do not specify the Dot, or the Cyclo, the Arche of all Hypothesis, however i was wrong. The Muslim Shia's and Sufi's accepted this differentiation of ousia and hyle, they accepted this Platonic notion and hence reasoned the divine punishment which is explained through the butterfly effect of Chaos Theory. That way the Muslims like the Christians became compatible with philosophy and the scientific method which assigns a Start, an Arche, a dot, a cyclo, a point 0 and goes on to measure the Holon(Holy) in relation to the Arche.

See below:

Shi'ism by Heinz Halm One of the founders of the neoplatonising schools in the Islamic community was the Persian Muhammad al-Nasafi, who began his activities in Nishapur and later in Bukhara; reputedly converted the Samanid Amir Nasr ibn Ahmad and several of his courtiers to the Ismailiyya (a branch within Shi'a), but was executed in 943 by the latter's son and successor Nuh. Citations from his main work al-Mahsul (the produce, the result) are perserved in later Ismaili documents.

"Nasafi's theology and cosmology can be reconstructed in terms of their
characteristic features: God is neither Thing nor Not-Thing; His being goes
beyond all linguistic concepts and is beyond all knowledge. By means of His
creates (abda'a)) from nothing the original creature (al-mubda' al-awwal),
the Intellect (al-'aql), which - eternal and perfect - rests itself and
through tought graps all Being in itself. In it the (universal) Soul (nafs),
whose essence, unlike that of the Intellect, is movement in time, comes into
being (tawallada); it is imperfect because its constant movement is
symptomatic of its striving for perfect knowledge which it will one day
obtain with the help of the Intellect. Its movement produces matter
(hayula, from Greek. hyle), while the repose of the Intellect gives rise to
form (shura); thus the material world is formed. The individual
human soul is a part (juz') of the Universal Soul and likewise strives
restlessly for perfection and peace, which it ultimately finds in knowledge
in the universal intellect. "

Judaism that is Orthodox Judaism rejected the Homo-ousion(substance) of Christ, rejected the fact that the thread is of the same substance, and even still with all the scientific proof that (panta rhei) all move along together with God as the starting point, they still reject this notion. When Christ came to teach them this Greek concept of Hyle and ousia and fulfill their scripts by adding the Homousion next to the image, they crucified Him, they rejected this notion, their temple was torn apart, and they became wonderers in the dessert. Now as powerful as they can be, with all the Help that money, military equipment the modern Era has to offer, and they are still unable to settle in Judeah, proving the allegories of their own scripts.

In simple terms Moses assigned a thread through the notion of the "same image", but he did not assign the position of God on the line of the thread, he left it open to fulfillment and hence he said that the Messiah will come to fulfill the scrips, he was no stupid Man he left it open to "correction" to fulfillment. When A Hebrew {Isus Christos} found out the differentiation between substance and image from the Ellinic philosophers of Ionia, Christ decided to fulfill the scripts and teach this unknown concept to the Jews, the concept of the ousia and the hyle. I am god..."hath said", i am of the same substance as God, and we all are of the same substance, we are all one thread, and God is the Arche, the "Alpha and the Omega", the starting point, the Homoousion of the Christians, the panta rhei of Heraclitus. Also one clarification here, one can say that God is the Arche and the Telos, like Aristotelos, and that it does not matter where one begins his assumption from, the difference between causal determinism and the inverse. However the telos is apeiron that is atelos, there is no telos, there is infinity*{See Professor Nanopoulos and Euclidean Geometry of the parallel lines, The Flat Universe of the T.O.E.}, and hence when our energies transmit, they never reach a bouncing point for the telos goes to infinity, they only reach a bouncing point in regards to the Star(t), not from the Telos, and hence why Plato was correct and Aristotelos invalid. There is only one point of reference not 2 in terms of the Divine and that is the Arche.

Euclid's Universe and Plato's Divine Demiourge are indeed what we like to call these days:

FACTS

Socrates, Phaedrus 270 c

"270 c
ψυχης ουν φυσιν αξιως λογου
κατανοησαι οιει δυνατον ειναι ανευ τις του ολου φυσεως;


psychis oun fysin axios logou kata-noesi oiei dynaton
einai anef tis toy oloy fyseos.

Psyche(psychis) is not in its(oun) nature(fyseos) worthy(axios) of logos(logou genitive) kata(to) noesis(understand) is(einai) possible(dynaton) not without(anef) the(tis) of(toy) holon(olou) nature(fyseos). Exact word by word.

Psyche in its nature is not worthy of logos/reason to understand is impossible without the holon nature, the nature of the whole..of the void, of chaos of all containing of the Holy."

Many Regards, devoted to my mother Vasiliki Kontakoy.

The Chaos "Heresy"

Chaos, just another theory, just another point of reference, i dare say NO!

In order for my "heresy" to become a bit clearer i would like you to watch this short video.
(second column, first row. 2 conflicting set of laws)

This video is advertising the new String Theory, there is a huge flaw in their assumptions, they believe that the structured theory of relativity comes in contrast with the sub-atomic chaotic world of quantum mechanics. What they fail to understand is that the structured law of relativity is not in conflict, but it is merely a part, an illusion of the outcome of chaotic combinations which we perceive as structured through our "mediocre" senses. These 2 are not in conflict, these 2 just share a cause and effect relationship, one deals with abstract infinity, the other assigns finite characteristics in order to be able to see, describe and express just a part of the infinity. If i was to express it mathematically, then i would say that Chaos is the circle and relativity theory is just one point of the angles. It is an assigned point of reference which gives us info only for that part not for the whole circle.

How will we ever understand Chaos? By assigning in-finite points of reference and then combining them, one would say, and that would be the easy way. Gathering the effects and try to figure out the cause. Thats how we as humans enter to the circular "mediocrity" of chasing our tail like a frenetic dog. Why do we have to understand and explain Chaos? Due to our curiosity another would say. In any case, understanding it or not, one can certainly try to align himself with the Silence of Chaos through meditation. After some serious thought, i have come to the conclusion, that as humans it is wiser for us to try to sense Chaos through meditation, instead of entering to the circular domain of Einstein and try to assign finite characteristics to infinite so that we get a small preview of a small part of the whole.

But why do we do it? In order to position ourselves on the relatively optimum point of our illusional set of reality. What do we achieve through this? or better what are we trying to achieve through this? Happyness, equilibrium, but is it equilibrium? Or is it just the equilibrium point of the subjective assigned optimum? Every time we find another equilibrium on another assigned point of reference we flatter ourselves by saying that we move forward, when in reality we are just moving on the same radius on the same circle, and when we finish with all the points, we will eventually end up to where we were before. So why do it? But then again, why not? These question will remain unanswered for the time being. The certain thing is lets not fool ourselves; forward has nothing to do with moving along the circle.(epi to cyclo). And on this sense it is God that will supposedly help us overcome this trouble. It is god that will help us exit from the frenetic circle.

The question that remains is why humans like to follow Gods such as the above(Allah, Savaoth, Yahve), when in fact these Gods are indeed just another point of reference, they are as much an idol as my £10 pound bill, when they speak, and act accordingly based on a set of values, they become what they supposedly fight against. They become just another point on the circle. When we know that Chaos(God) is the bloody circle. When we know already with much certainty that the circle is independent from our positioning on the circle. But is it? Independent? Ofc its not, and hence the butterfly effect. It is in this sense, that we are part of the circle, that we are kat' eikona and kath 'omoiosis, it is this sense that God is "inside" us, it is the power of the butterfly effect that explains that we are not independent values outside the circle of God, but we are indeed part of the circle, and we influence and get influenced along the lines of the circle. However, entering on the belief that our small actions are enough to cause the circle to relocate us inside or outside of the circle is indeed another manifestation of our ego-centric nature. Valid hypothesis, sure it is, valid conclusion? there's a question....I say, whatever path one chooses, either assigning finite point of the circle and chase his own tail, or choose to live in the ignorance of the unexplained, one must comprehend Epicurus full words: The "Gods" are so "far" from us, that even our combined butterfly effects are not enough to cause them to destroy us or punish us. And it is in this sense that all organized religions got it wrong and went that far as to create a system of values based on the theory of the butterfly effect when in essense, they did exactly what they were not supposed to. They assigned points of reference and brought God down to earth. The Hypothesis might be valid, but the samples have proven to be either incorrect or misplaced or insufficient. The most correct or better the least wrong is the one who chooses the best and most voluminous samples and always in regard with the optimum for the specific of that given time and space. And hence why science and secularism or Logos always comes on top. In short, it is due to the assignment of those that are immediately needed to secure an optimum position for that specific, instead of assigning one optimum for everything at the same time, religion only chooses to see a small part of the picture, and congratulate herself afterwards, for holding only one perspective. It surely all boils down to one. But not the one that religion has us believe, the one that religion has us believe is as valid as the optimum that science has us believe, with the exception that science and philosophy, will not stop to the one, but they will go for the infinity in order to see the actual one and on the way to solve the billions of questions regarding always our positioning on the circle. Will we ever understand Chaos? Probably not.

Science understands, sees and accepts its own mediocrity, Allah, Yahve, Savaoth do not see their own mediocrity for they are just assigned points of reference.

Chaos is not another point of reference, it is the circle.

And hence why Chaos never speaks, or acts on a behalf. Its majesty no matter if comprehended or not, there is one sure thing about it, Chaos will never order itself for our little mediocre minds. Chaos will never become just another point of reference.

Regards.